There is powerful research that concludes that collaboration in fact yields results. James Surowiecki epic work, Wisdom of the Crowds, was groundbreaking in summarizing research that strongly supported the principle that “No one of us is smarter than all of us.”

One example in the book, that I found particularly useful in helping me understand the benefits achieved through collaboration, comes from the television game show, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, hosted by Regis Philbin.

During the show, contestants worked through trivia questions in their attempt to win $1,000,000. As a fun twist, if the contestant faced difficulty with answering a question, they had three options available. They were only allowed to use each option once, throughout their time on the show. The options included:

1. 50-50 – The computer eliminates two of the incorrect answers, giving the contestant a fifty-fifty chance at the right response
2. Phone-a-Friend – Prior to the show, contestants singled out someone they could call for help who they considered one of the smartest people they knew
3. Poll the Audience – The studio audience would cast votes by computer

From the results* of the show, Surowiecki writes:

“Everything we think we know about intelligence suggests that the smart individual would offer the most help. And, in fact, the ‘experts’ did okay, offering the right answer – under pressure – almost 65% of the time. But they paled in comparison to the audiences. Those random crowds of people with nothing better to do on a weekday afternoon and sit in a TV studio picked the right answer 91% of the time…” (Wisdom of the Crowds, 2004, Page 4)

Tip 4: Collaboration is the glue of insightful leadership, shared-accountability, and results

What does this have to do with church budgeting? The show is just the fun example of the benfits of collaboration. But, collaborative budget processes and operational management does prove time and time again to yield results.

A budget that is developed by one or two people does nothing to build a broader spirit of shared accountability across the church. Many leaders feel they may lose control when they bring others into the budget process. However, management research proves that involvement by a team in financial matters, specifically people responsible for the finances of a particular area, will more likely lead to better results.

Why?

If someone is involved in the budget process, and they feel as if they have had the opportunity to offer feedback and input, they’re more likely to “own” and “buy-in” to what has been created. Without participation in the process, resentment builds and can ultimately lead staff to consciously, or unconsciously, undermine what has been created.

Collaboration paired with open communication is where the budget will help church managers achieve the greatest potential of their organization.

Read more tips from Church Finance 30/30 – 30 Tips in 30 Days!

*Note: Surowiecki admits that this experiment would not stand scientific scrutiny. However, other examples in the book, would, in fact, support such an inquiry.

There is no doubt that church managers are busy people. As you develop a budget, focusing on the “right” areas of the budget means prioritizing your time so that you spend the greatest amount of effort on those areas that will provide the most significant benefits. A nice tool to deploy during this phase of the process is to calculate the Budget Category Impact Percentage (BCIP).

If time is money, the BCIP calculation is a simple formula that can assist you to quickly assess the relative size of a specific budget category as compared to the total receipt or spending for the overall Income or Expense category. If you calculate which categories have the greatest impact on the budget, you can spend the majority of your time focusing on those areas.

Let me use a simple example of revenue categories to show you what I mean:

St. Jane’s Church

At the fictional parish of St. Jane’s, the church receives revenues from the following sources:

Next, calculate the BCIP by dividing each Revenue Category by Total Revenue.

• Total Collections ($357,000) divided by Total Revenue ($378,300) = BCIP (94%)
• Total Holyday Collections ($16,000) divided by Total Revenue ($378,300) = BCIP (4%)

Using a spreadsheet or other mode to make calculations, you can make the calculations for each category quickly by dragging the formula down the column. As you review the information, what are your observations?

Like most churches, Sunday Collections drive the majority of the income for St. Jane’s. You can see that items like Flower Donations and Bulletin Advertising make up only a tiny proportion of the overall revenue.

“So, why does this matter?”

The problem is that many churches spend an inordinate amount of time on reviewing/estimating/analyzing categories that are not driving large portions of the budget. If you have two hours to spend on a budget analysis, focus on the largest drivers of revenues and expenses. By the way, the same process used above for revenues should also be used for expenses. Most likely, after you calculate the BCIP on expenses, you’ll find that salary and benefits make up a large proportion of expenses, and this makes sense because people are your most important resource! Take the analysis to the next step – what is the next expense category that is driving expenses? And the next?

Tip 7: Prioritize Time – Calculate a Budget Category Impact Percentage (BCIP)

Armed with this information, you can begin by reviewing those categories with the largest impact on the budget. I am not arguing that all budget categories are not important. But, with limited time, focus on the income or expense categories with the greatest impact on the budget.

Read More Church Finance 30/30 Tips

Portions of this text come from Michael J. Castrilli and Charles E. Zech, Parish Finance: Best Practices in Church Management (New York: Paulist Press, 2016) Chapter 5.